Share this article!

A Phil Hall Op-Ed: During the final weeks of his too-short life, Charlie Kirk raised several red flags about the state of the housing market. His messaging deserves to be heard again.

In July, Kirk used an appearance on Fox News to raise a taboo subject that neither Republicans nor Democrats want to acknowledge – the impact of institutional investors on housing.

“One out of four of all home purchases in the last year were out of these firms like BlackRock,” Kirk said. “They come in and are bidding out first-time homebuyers.”

Kirk added, “Homeownership is the cornerstone of the American Dream, and that dream is being auctioned off to the highest bidder on Wall Street.”

That situation has been festering for several years. The Biden administration conspicuously avoided discussing it, which is not surprising considering that executives at hedge funds and the major banks were among the major donors to that regime. The Trump administration is equally silent on the subject, which is also not a surprise when you consider Scott Bessent’s background in hedge funds and Bill Pulte’s work in private equity.

Also in July, Kirk spoke with the Washington Post about the need for the Trump administration to address the challenges facing today’s housing market.

“If we do not improve the material conditions of the younger voters, and do it quickly, the Mamdani effect will spread,” Kirk said, referring to the Democratic Socialist mayoral candidate in New York City. He also challenged the administration to lay out a game-changing strategy, suggesting that “we’re going to build 10 million homes, Marshall Plan-type thing” to address the evaporation of homeownership affordability.

Kirk quizzed both Bessent and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner on his radio show about the administration’s efforts to strengthen the housing market. Unfortunately, Kirk may have been a little too respectful with his guests, allowing them to recite administration talking points without asking tough follow-up questions regarding specific strategies and how to measure results of their work.

In one of his radio show monologues, Kirk argued that Gen Z was turning into a renting generation due to the lack of affordable homeownership opportunities. He noted how today’s homebuyers are coming later to the American Dream, which he blamed on overpriced housing and high interest rates.

“An entire generation are making their landlords rich, and they are experiencing none of the upside of this economy,” he declared.

Last month, Kirk argued that more vigorous law enforcement could help lower housing prices by making high-crime neighborhoods safer and more desirable for residency. The far-left Daily Caller referred to his idea as “bonkers,” although a casual look at the exodus of residents from high-crime cities such as San Francisco would affirm that he knew what he was talking about.

Kirk’s observations on the housing market were cogent and surprising. He encouraged the administration to do better – he was one of the very few prominent conservative voices to make such a call. Mercifully, he kept his comments on interest rates focused on economic policy and not personal attacks against the Federal Reserve leadership – a far cry from the puerile verbiage from Trump and Pulte.

As for the assassination of Kirk, I am reminded on comments made 24 years ago today by Pope John Paul II in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks: “Even if the forces of darkness appear to prevail, those who believe in God know that evil and death do not have the final say. Christian hope is based on this truth.”

Charlie Kirk’s words and legacy will continue inspire those who listened to him and respected what he was trying to accomplish. The messenger is no longer with us, but his message will go on.

Phil Hall is editor of Weekly Real Estate News. He can be reached at [email protected].