Share this article!

A Phil Hall Op-Ed: Last week, I used this column to offer my opinion on Vice President Kamala Harris’ plans for fixing the challenges facing the housing market if she was elected president. This week, the column is devoted to the plans from former President Donald Trump – which is not going to be easy, since Trump has barely acknowledged the housing market in his campaign to regain the White House.

One could argue that Trump’s omission of housing issues from his campaign is rooted in a political philosophy that is antithetical to Harris’ approach. With Harris, the solutions are patches in the form of government programs covering grants, tax credits, incentives and rent caps. The problem is that they don’t address the underlying problems impacting housing and the wider economy, but rather Harris tries to make adjustments so people can adjust to the current.

Trump, on the other hand, is looking at the bigger problem – an economy that doesn’t work for the average American – and he is pledging to fix that. In Trump’s vision, people will not require special government assistance and incentives – as he views the situation, prices will not be sky-high in a healthy economy and people will have more money in their wallets for purchasing lower-priced goods.

In concept, this makes sense. During the Biden-Harris era, the price of everything has soared. Reversing the policies that created the mess would benefit Americans, especially for those who cannot afford to get into homeownership.

However, Trump’s focus has three very serious flaws.

First, Trump isn’t addressing the basic problem that housing demand continues to outpace supply. Harris is proposing a goal of 3 million new homes in her first four years as president. To her credit, she is acknowledging the need to build more homes, but her goal is unrealistic – for many housing developments, it could take four years or more just to get local zoning approval and financing, especially if those projects emphasize affordable housing.

One might imagine that Trump would listen to the concerns of many housing industry professionals, especially the National Association of Home Builders, who argue that federal regulations and codes drive up the cost of housing construction and limit output. Trump’s administration was notable for trying to cut through the regulatory miasma to make it easier for businesses to operate, but he has yet to address if this will be repeated for home construction if he is re-elected.

Second, Trump has said nothing about the encroachment of hedge funds and real estate investment trusts into the single-family housing market. A recent study by the New York University Stern School of Business determined that institutional investors decreased available housing stock for homeowners by as much as 30%. Harris has spoken vaguely about dealing with “corporate landlords,” but this issue metastasized during the Biden-Harris era and no attempt has been made to stop it. Trump needs to be confronted by this issue.

Third, Trump has made illegal immigration a centerpiece of his campaign, and rightfully so – the alleged “Border Czar” failed to do her job and the nation is in worst shape for it. But Trump is going in the wrong direction by conflating that issue with housing.

Trump made an odd promise that he would ban illegal immigrants from obtaining mortgages, which is something that a president cannot unilaterally achieve – and in any event, that’s not a dilemma creating problems in the housing market. He also promised that he would make companies offering subsidized housing require proof of citizenship of their tenants – but one can easily imagine civil liberty lawsuits claiming that would run afoul of the Fair Housing Act.

And while Trump is promising a mass deportation of the illegals who entered the country in the Biden-Harris era, that could spark a new problem in terms of expanding housing supply when one considers the disproportionate number of illegals employed in the construction trades. Trump has offered no proposal to address how he can keep the construction industry operating if so many of its workers wind up getting arrested for deportation.

One wild card from Trump was the unexpected new pledge to “get SALT back” – the restoration of state and local taxes that was capped at $10,000 as part of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This pledge is obviously meant to attract wealthier Blue State voters who were most impacted by the SALT cap and it is not something that will help the wider nation.

Of course, there is more to the election than housing issues. As for which candidate deserves your vote – well, that’s your decision to make on Nov. 5.

Phil Hall is editor of Weekly Real Estate News. He can be reached at [email protected].

Illustration: hoekstrarogier / Pixabay

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favorite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favorite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Create an agent account

Manage your listings, profile and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Create an agent account

Manage your listings, profile and more

Sign up with email