Fannie Mae Is Opening the Door to Proactive PMI Cancellation Outreach

Share this article!

Fannie Mae is moving toward letting mortgage servicers proactively contact homeowners who may be able to eliminate private mortgage insurance, a policy shift that could put monthly savings in front of borrowers who otherwise may not know to ask.

Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte said Tuesday that Fannie Mae will align its outreach policy with Freddie Mac, which already permits mortgage companies to contact borrowers who may qualify to cancel mortgage insurance. The change is aimed particularly at borrowers whose equity has grown because they have paid down principal or their homes have appreciated.

The distinction matters because Fannie Mae’s current servicing rules treat the two paths differently. Its published Servicing Guide allows servicers to identify loans approaching mortgage-insurance termination based on the property’s original value and tell borrowers what they must do. But for termination based on the property’s current value, the guide says the servicer must not solicit the borrower and may act only after a borrower initiates the request.

That is the gap FHFA is now signaling it wants to close.

What is changing — and what is not

The policy change described by Pulte is about outreach. It does not mean private mortgage insurance will automatically disappear whenever a home’s market value rises, and it does not erase the eligibility rules governing cancellation.

Under Fannie Mae’s current guide, automatic termination for many one-unit principal residences and second homes is generally tied to the date the scheduled loan balance reaches 78% of the property’s original value, provided the loan is current. Borrowers may also request earlier termination under specified conditions.

For requests based on current value, Fannie Mae requires a valuation and an acceptable payment history, among other conditions. Depending on the property and circumstances, that valuation may involve a broker price opinion or appraisal. Fannie Mae’s May servicing guidance lists borrower costs of $190 for a BPO, $450 for a restricted appraisal on a one-unit property and $750 for an appraisal on a two- to four-unit property.

Those requirements are important because a homeowner receiving an outreach call would still need to qualify under the applicable rules. The change is designed to make eligible borrowers aware of the option, not to guarantee cancellation.

Why the outreach issue matters

Private mortgage insurance helps borrowers obtain conventional mortgages with smaller down payments by protecting the lender or investor against a portion of the loss if the borrower defaults. The borrower typically pays the premium, making PMI part of the monthly housing cost.

That cost can become unnecessary once sufficient equity has been established, but the cancellation rules are not always obvious to homeowners. A borrower who bought with a low down payment several years ago may have accumulated equity through both amortization and home-price appreciation without realizing a current-value review could create a path to remove PMI.

Fannie Mae’s own servicing technology already supports borrower-initiated mortgage-insurance termination. Its Servicing Management Default Underwriter can evaluate requests based on original or current property value, apply an automated valuation model in some circumstances and return a decision to the servicer.

What the existing current-value rule has not allowed is the servicer to start that conversation. Pulte’s announced alignment would change that.

A meaningful servicing change, but details still matter

The operational impact will depend on how Fannie Mae implements the new outreach authority and what instructions it gives servicers. FHFA had not posted a detailed implementation bulletin on its public news-release page when WRE News reviewed the change Wednesday morning.

That means servicers should not treat the director’s announcement as permission to disregard the current Fannie Mae Servicing Guide before formal implementation instructions are issued. The existing guide still states that a servicer must not solicit a borrower for mortgage-insurance termination based on current value.

The direction of policy, however, is clear: FHFA wants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac operating under a more consistent approach that allows mortgage companies to tell borrowers when they may have a legitimate opportunity to shed an extra monthly cost.

For an industry confronting affordability pressure from mortgage rates, taxes, insurance and home prices, the potential savings are narrower than a rate cut but much more immediate for borrowers who already qualify.

The next thing to watch is Fannie Mae’s formal servicing guidance: when the outreach change becomes effective, which loans can be identified for proactive contact, what disclosures servicers must provide and whether the eligibility or valuation process changes along with the communication rule.