Watson Realty Makes 24/7 Personal Security a Companywide Resource for 800 Agents

Share this article!

Watson Realty Corp. is making personal security a company-provided resource for roughly 800 real estate agents across Florida and Georgia, a notable shift in an industry where agents are routinely expected to manage the risks of showings, open houses and first meetings largely on their own.

The Jacksonville-based brokerage has entered into an agreement with Our Bond Inc. to provide Bond’s preventative personal-security service across its agent population. The companies announced the rollout Sept. 11, timed to coincide with REALTOR Safety Month.

Watson, founded in 1965, operates about 40 offices in Northeast and Central Florida and Southeast Georgia, along with affiliated mortgage and title operations. Under the agreement, Bond becomes a standard resource for Watson agents rather than an optional service each agent must buy individually.

That distinction is more important than the technology itself. Real estate has no shortage of safety apps, check-in tools and emergency features. The harder question for brokerages has been whether safety is treated as an individual responsibility or as part of the operating infrastructure a company provides to people who work in the field.

Real estate agents routinely meet strangers in empty houses, travel alone to unfamiliar addresses and work outside ordinary business hours. The physical workplace changes from appointment to appointment, and a broker cannot supervise a showing the way a manager can monitor an office.

Bond cited the National Association of Realtors’ 2024 Member Safety Report, which found that 22% of Realtors had experienced a situation that made them fear for their personal safety. The statistic is not evidence that every showing is dangerous, but it helps explain why safety has remained a persistent industry issue despite years of training and awareness campaigns.

The service Watson is adopting is intended to operate before a situation reaches the point of calling 911. An agent can request a live security professional to monitor a showing or open house, track travel to and from a property, conduct a check-in when an agent fails to arrive as expected, assist with de-escalation and coordinate with first responders when necessary.

That creates a different model from a panic button. A panic button assumes the agent recognizes an emergency and has time to activate it. Preventative monitoring is designed around the much more common gray area in which something feels wrong but has not yet become an obvious emergency.

Watson President William Watson III framed the decision as an obligation to agents who spend much of their working lives outside the office. That approach could become more important as brokerages compete for experienced agents on services that go beyond commission splits, lead generation and marketing technology.

Agent safety is also an unusual benefit because its value is difficult to measure through production statistics. A CRM can be judged by leads and closings. A security program is successful partly when nothing happens.

The business case therefore rests on risk management, recruiting, retention and culture as much as direct return on investment. Adoption will matter just as much as access: agents still have to use the service consistently, understand when to initiate monitoring and know how it fits with emergency procedures and local law enforcement.

Bond has a financial interest in presenting the real estate industry as a large growth market. The company estimates the U.S. opportunity for its platform at more than $300 million annually and more than $1.5 billion globally. Those are Bond’s estimates, not independent market measurements, and should be treated accordingly.

The more relevant test for the industry will be whether other large brokerages follow Watson’s lead and make personal-security coverage a standard operating benefit rather than another tool agents are encouraged to purchase on their own.

Real estate companies have spent years building agent-service packages around technology, coaching, marketing, transaction support and health or financial benefits. Field safety has often sat outside that package, addressed through annual training, written policies and reminders to use good judgment.

Watson’s rollout moves the issue closer to the center of the brokerage-agent relationship. It says, in effect, that an agent working alone in a vacant property is still at work and that the company has a role in providing support during that assignment.

That does not eliminate personal responsibility. Agents still need to verify prospects when appropriate, communicate itineraries, maintain situational awareness and leave a property when something feels unsafe. Nor does a private security service replace police or emergency medical response.

But the companywide deployment creates a clearer safety net than a recommendation buried in a policy manual. For an industry built around independent professionals working in highly variable environments, that could prove to be the more consequential part of the announcement.