Weekly Real Estate News
Summary
A cybersecurity incident at the Bankruptcy Noticing Center has halted federal bankruptcy notices nationwide since October 9. Courts in Illinois and Indiana issued October 16 orders addressing missed notices and case deadlines.
Federal bankruptcy judges are changing how they handle missed notices and case deadlines after a cybersecurity incident disabled the nationwide system used to deliver court notices to creditors, debtors and attorneys. New orders issued Friday in Illinois and Indiana show the disruption has moved beyond a technical outage into the administration of active bankruptcy cases.
The Bankruptcy Noticing Center has been unable to produce and distribute notices since October 9, according to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. The center, operated for the judiciary by BAE Systems, handles notices for federal bankruptcy courts across the country. The judiciary disclosed the cybersecurity incident October 15; the company is investigating and attempting to restore service. Officials have not announced a restoration date or said whether sensitive information was accessed.
The consequences matter for mortgage servicers and other creditors whose rights can turn on the timely receipt of a bankruptcy notice. Filing a bankruptcy petition can trigger an automatic stay, while subsequent notices may set hearings, objections and other deadlines. Missing an expected court communication can complicate a creditor’s ability to respond. Whether a particular deadline changes, however, depends on the court, the case and the governing order.
Illinois gives judges authority to address missed notices
In General Order 26-04, dated October 16, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois found that the interruption had prevented certain required notices from being transmitted since October 9. Citing Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9006, the court said judges may extend or reset deadlines or continue hearings where necessary to address the disruption.
That relief is not a blanket suspension of the court’s calendar. The order states that scheduled hearings will proceed unless the court orders otherwise. A party can request relief by written motion or orally at an already scheduled hearing, and parties should confer when practicable about whether the requested accommodation is disputed.
The distinction is important for creditors managing large portfolios. The order gives judges a means to prevent prejudice from missing notices but does not promise that every missed deadline is automatically forgiven. Creditors and counsel still need to review the orders governing their cases and the rules of the particular district.
The Southern District of Indiana also issued General Order 26-0004 on October 16, addressing continuing interruptions to notice and service requirements and meetings of creditors. The court separately posted updated guidance for practitioners. These measures follow earlier emergency procedures issued after the outage began.
Filing systems remain available in many districts
The incident affects the Bankruptcy Noticing Center, not every function of every bankruptcy court. The Northern District of Indiana said it would continue accepting filings, opening cases and processing documents, even though notices and orders could be delayed. Its guidance describes how attorneys can retrieve creditor names and addresses through CM/ECF when the usual mailing matrix is unavailable.
That workaround has limits. The court cautioned that its creditor list does not necessarily include all parties who must receive service, including debtors, trustees and the U.S. Trustee. Lawyers serving papers must determine independently who is entitled to notice under the applicable rules.
The federal judiciary’s bankruptcy noticing guidance explains that the center distributes both electronic and mailed notices. High-volume recipients may receive electronic notices through accounts maintained by the center, which are also affected by the outage. A lender or servicer that ordinarily relies on those notices should not assume its normal notification feed is complete during the interruption.
The Eastern District of New York posted additional guidance and an administrative order October 16, underscoring the variation in local responses. Courts may adopt different procedures for service, meetings and extensions; there is no single nationwide order automatically resolving every affected deadline.
What remains unknown
BAE Systems has said the incident is isolated to the Bankruptcy Noticing Center systems it operates for the judiciary. That is the company’s account of the incident’s scope, not a completed public forensic finding. The judiciary has not disclosed how the incident occurred, whether information was taken or when full noticing will resume.
Nor has the judiciary provided a nationwide count of notices delayed, cases affected or deadlines missed. Without those figures, it would be speculative to calculate the financial exposure of mortgage lenders or the number of borrowers whose proceedings might be affected.
For servicers, bankruptcy counsel and distressed-debt investors, the immediate task is operational: check active dockets directly, review each district’s emergency orders, preserve records of missing notices and seek relief promptly where the outage has affected a specific case. The orders issued Friday establish that courts recognize the disruption. They do not eliminate the need for parties to protect their positions while the noticing system remains unavailable.
