Real Estate’s Next Fight Is Over Who Keeps the Homeowner Relationship

Share this article!

For most people in real estate and mortgage, closing day has always carried a sense of finality. The papers are signed, the keys change hands, commissions are paid, the loan funds and everybody moves on to the next transaction.

The homeowner, of course, doesn’t move on.

They may live in that house for years. During that time they will make mortgage payments, pay property taxes and insurance, build equity, renovate, refinance, have children, change jobs, retire, divorce, inherit property, buy another home or eventually sell the one they just purchased.

Our industry has spent an extraordinary amount of money trying to acquire that customer at the beginning of the process while routinely surrendering much of the relationship once the transaction is finished.

HomeServices of America may have just given the rest of the industry a reason to rethink that model.

The company announced Wednesday that Prosperity Home Mortgage, its wholly owned mortgage company, is adding mortgage servicing to the HomeServices portfolio. HomeServices is positioning the move as the latest expansion of OnePoint, its effort to connect brokerage, mortgage, title, escrow, property and casualty insurance and now mortgage servicing.

Prosperity is not a small lender experimenting around the edges. According to the company, it originates nearly $9 billion in mortgages annually through approximately 21,000 transactions.

What interests me isn’t the size of Prosperity’s production, though. It is what HomeServices believes happens after those loans close.

Historically, that connection has often been broken.

Prosperity’s own consumer materials currently explain that most of its loans are not serviced long term by Prosperity and instead are transferred to third-party servicers. That’s hardly unusual. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau notes that it is common for a company other than the original lender to take over servicing after a mortgage is made.

Anyone who has been in mortgage lending long enough understands the economics behind that system. Origination and servicing are different businesses. Servicing requires capital, technology, regulatory infrastructure and an operating model capable of handling everything from routine payments and escrow accounts to borrowers who run into serious financial trouble.

But there is another side to the equation that I think housing companies are beginning to understand more clearly.

The servicer may have the longest continuous relationship with the homeowner of anyone involved in the original transaction.

That matters.

Closing Was Never the End of the Customer Journey

A real estate agent may work intensely with a client for several months. A loan officer may speak with the borrower dozens of times during the financing process. The title and escrow professionals become critical as the transaction approaches closing.

Then almost everyone disappears from the homeowner’s financial life.

The mortgage servicer doesn’t.

The servicer sends the statements, processes payments, answers questions and generally manages the escrow account when one exists. If the homeowner encounters financial difficulty, the servicer can also become the organization involved in available loss-mitigation options.

That creates something valuable that doesn’t fit neatly on a closing statement: repeated contact.

HomeServices isn’t being subtle about why it sees an opportunity here. Chris Kelly, the company’s president and CEO, said in announcing the expansion that the industry has long accepted a system in which consumers are handed from company to company, including another possible handoff after closing. He also specifically tied the new servicing capability to preserving the relationship between real estate professionals and their clients.

Prosperity President and CEO Justin Messer described the same strategy from the mortgage side. The objective is to remain connected as a customer’s needs change, whether that involves a question about the existing mortgage, a possible refinance or another home purchase.

This did not suddenly become the company’s strategy this week.

In a January 2025 interview with HousingWire, Messer was asked about servicing and said retaining it would be a natural extension of Prosperity’s business, while explaining that HomeServices had not yet been willing to allocate the capital required for servicing retention.

Nineteen months later, HomeServices is adding servicing.

That progression is worth paying attention to.

There Is More at Stake Than the Monthly Mortgage Payment

I don’t think the larger story here is payment processing.

The larger story is customer retention.

Consider what the housing industry has built around the consumer. Real estate companies want the brokerage relationship. Mortgage companies want the financing. Title companies want the closing. Insurance companies want the homeowners policy. Home-equity companies want the homeowner when equity becomes useful. Lenders want the refinance. And eventually another agent and another lender want the next purchase.

Those businesses have traditionally competed for pieces of the same consumer at different moments.

An integrated housing company sees the same person differently. It sees one relationship that can potentially continue across many of those moments.

Servicing gives that model a bridge across the years between transactions.

That doesn’t guarantee the homeowner will refinance with the same lender or use the same real estate company when it is time to move. Consumers remain free to shop, and they should.

But staying connected is considerably different from trying to reacquire someone five or ten years later.

This is where I believe the competitive implications become much larger than today’s HomeServices announcement.

Independent real estate brokerages, mortgage brokers, loan officers, title companies and insurance professionals aren’t simply competing against another provider for the next transaction. Increasingly, they may be competing against ecosystems designed to maintain a relationship with the consumer across the entire period of homeownership.

That is a different competitive environment.

Integration Can Be Good for Consumers. It Still Has to Earn Their Trust.

There is a temptation whenever a large housing company expands vertically to immediately treat integration as something consumers should fear.

I don’t think that is a fair conclusion.

Fragmentation can be frustrating.

A buyer can start with a real estate agent, provide information to a mortgage lender, deal with another organization for title or settlement, obtain insurance somewhere else and then receive notice after closing that the mortgage payments will go to a company they have never dealt with before.

There is real value in reducing unnecessary handoffs.

There is also real value in competition.

The strongest version of an integrated model should have to win on both. It should make the process easier without making the consumer feel trapped inside an ecosystem. Convenience should complement consumer choice rather than quietly replace it.

Federal law already recognizes some of that tension in settlement services. RESPA permits affiliated business arrangements under specified conditions, including disclosure requirements, and generally prohibits requiring consumers to use an affiliated provider except in limited circumstances.

Servicing is also heavily regulated, and a transfer of servicing comes with consumer protections. Importantly, borrowers generally do not get to choose whether their servicing is transferred.

That is precisely why the quality of the relationship after closing matters so much.

A connected ecosystem can become a better customer experience. A poorly executed one can simply become a larger organization through which a frustrated consumer has to navigate.

Scale does not automatically create loyalty. Good service does.

Independent Professionals Should Pay Attention

The lesson I take from HomeServices’ move isn’t that every mortgage company should build a servicing operation. That would make little economic or operational sense for many lenders.

It also isn’t that every brokerage needs to own mortgage, title and insurance companies.

The lesson is that the industry needs to stop treating a closed transaction as a completed relationship.

Independent professionals actually have an advantage here if they choose to use it. A good loan officer can remain valuable to a family long after the loan funds. A good real estate agent can become the person a homeowner calls about much more than listing a house. Neither requires ownership of the servicing platform to maintain that trust.

But it does require intention.

Too many businesses spend heavily on leads while neglecting people who already know them. Too many professionals obsess over customer acquisition costs without placing the same value on customer retention. We celebrate the closing, send the occasional automated anniversary message, and then act surprised when the customer uses somebody else five years later.

Meanwhile, larger housing companies are building infrastructure specifically designed to prevent that relationship from disappearing.

HomeServices has now made its strategy unusually clear.

The company wants to be connected when a consumer searches for a house. It wants to participate when the consumer buys it, finances it, closes it and insures it. With servicing, it now intends to extend that connection further into the years that follow.

Other companies will be watching.

So should every independent professional in housing.

Because the next major competitive fight in real estate may have far less to do with who captured the internet lead first.

It may come down to who gave the homeowner enough value that they never needed to be reacquired in the first place.